New Lead Paint Law

I get press releases sent to me on a regular basis. On some days as many as ten.

Yesterday, I received a very important one about a fantastic change in the Federal law about lead paint removal regulations.

Read the press release below from the Window and Door Manufacturers Association and you should take pause. The Federal EPA overstepped their bounds years ago and it's costing you HUGE MONEY. What's more, they called for a test kit that doesn't yet exist.

When I first saw the new lead paint removal law back about five or so years ago, I shook my head. I've written all about the dangers of lead paint here at this website. Use my search engine to read them. This important press release was mentioned in my May 17, 2015 AsktheBuilder Antigua Edition Newsletter.

But the new law was simply too harsh and caused you to spend lots of unnecessary money in most cases.

Here's the press release:

The Window and Door Manufacturers Association (WDMA) applauds the introduction of legislation today in the U.S. House of Representatives that would reform the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Lead: Renovation, Repair and Painting (LRRP) Rule to reduce the burden the rule has placed on the home retrofit market while protecting pregnant women and small children from lead hazards. The "Lead Exposure Reduction Amendments Act of 2015" (H.R. 2328) was introduced by Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) and nine original cosponsors. Cramer is a member of the House Energy & Commerce Committee which has jurisdiction over this issue.

"Since the inception of the EPA Lead Rule five years ago, EPA has expanded the rule beyond its original goal of protecting pregnant women and small children while mismanaging the implementation of the rule and failing to meet its own requirements to produce an accurate test kit," said WDMA President and CEO Michael O'Brien. "This legislation is a common-sense fix which will refocus efforts on protecting the targeted demographic and was one of the key issues WDMA members lobbied on during our recent Legislative Conference.  We applaud Congressman Cramer for his leadership on this issue."

The LRRP rule requires renovation work that disturbs more than six square feet on the interior of a pre-1978 home and all window and door replacement to follow rigorous and costly work practices supervised by an EPA-certified renovator and requires that it be performed by an EPA-certified renovation firm. In July 2010, EPA removed the "opt-out provision" from the rule which allowed homeowners without children under six or pregnant women residing in the home to allow their contractor to forego the use of lead-safe work practices. By removing the opt-out provision, EPA more than doubled the number of homes subject to the LRRP Rule, and EPA has estimated that this amendment will add more than $336 million per year in compliance costs to the regulated community.

In addition, despite EPA stating a commercially available test kit producing no more than 10 percent false positives would be on the market when the rule took effect in 2010, no test kit on the market meets this standard. The lack of compliant test kits approved by the EPA has added millions in compliance costs with consumers paying for unnecessary work because of false positive test results.

Among the key provisions, this bill would restore the "opt-out" clause, suspend the rule if EPA cannot approve a commercially-available test kit meeting the regulation's requirements, prohibit expansion of the rule to commercial buildings until EPA conducts a study demonstrating the need for such action and provide a de minimis exemption for first-time paperwork violations.

In addition to Cramer, the nine original cosponsors of H.R.2328 are:  Reps. Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA), Pete Sessions (R-TX), Charles Fleischmann (R-TN), Rod Blum (R-IA), Steve Stivers (R-OH), Tim Murphy (R-PA), Collin Peterson (D-MN), and Chris Collins (R-NY).

WDMA has made this issue a top legislative priority and has set up a grassroots action center where industry professionals can send a message to their House member urging them to cosponsor the legislation. To send a message, click here.